Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Re-Evaluate Your Investment Property | TheStreet

Re-Evaluate Your Investment Property

By Jennifer Openshaw
TheStreet.com Contributor
3/19/2007 12:01 PM EDT
Click here for more stories by Jennifer Openshaw

What? Am I finally reversing course and throwing in the towel on investment real estate?


You know me better than that.
Actually, I'm a firm believer in the short- and long-term prospects of real property investments. True, we're going through a soft spot now, but really, I believe we're OK.

So why the dire headline? Should you pitch your properties out the window and head for cover? That's not what I'm saying at all.

If you really think like an investor, conscious of investment returns and fully realized tax deductions, take note. It might be time to sell.

I know it may seem counterintuitive in a soft market.

But soft markets are a good time to pick up other investments at attractive prices. And the 1031 exchange really makes it possible...

Monday, January 01, 2007

Buying a Small Part Of Something Big | NYT

Buying a Small Part Of Something Big

By VIVIAN MARINO

15 October 2006
The New York Times

SUPPOSE you acquired an apartment or office building a few years ago. Chances are, if you bought in the right market, you've watched that property appreciate in value while amassing a steady stream of rental income.

Now it's time to sell -- perhaps you received an offer you can't refuse, or you have grown weary of playing landlord -- and you are facing a big capital-gains tax. Under current tax law, you can avoid the bill, or at least defer it, by rolling over the proceeds from the sale into a property of similar or greater value. But the rules say a replacement asset must be chosen within 45 days and closed on within 180 days.

One solution for the time-pressed investor is a tenant-in-common program, an increasingly popular investment that offers fractional ownership of commercial real estate, from apartments to factories. TIC's, derived from English common law, are structured so that investors -- up to 35 per deal are allowed -- are direct owners of real estate, enabling individual investments to qualify for these ''like kind'' exchanges under Section 1031 of the federal tax code.

They are attractive because investors get a chance to own part of a property that would otherwise be out of their reach. Independently managed, the properties provide income through cash flow from tenants.

Billions of dollars have poured into TIC’s since 2002, when the Internal Revenue Service clarified their status for Section 1031 exchanges. Last year, sponsors of TIC’s sold around $7.2 billion worth of properties to investors, according to Omni Brokerage of Salt Lake City, more than the nearly $7 billion sold in the previous four years, 2001 through 2004. (Equity in TIC buildings was $3.2 billion last year alone, after totaling $3.05 billion for the four previous years combined... )

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Sperry Van Ness' Frosh on the State of the TIC Market | CPN

Sperry Van Ness' Frosh on the State of the TIC Market

December 06, 2006

By Gail Kalinoski, Contributing Editor

Although the TIC, or Tenants in Common, is one of the oldest forms of real estate investment and in recent years has gained increasing popularity because of the tax benefits, at least one commercial real estate executive is concerned changes in the market could spell trouble for TIC investors.

David Frosh (pictured), president of Irvine, Calif.-based Sperry Van Ness Commercial Real Estate Advisors, spoke to CPN this week about his take on the TIC market.

CPN: What is the best way for TIC sponsors to address brokers' concerns and what are they?

FROSH: We believe sponsors that treat the TIC as real estate instead of a security have an advantage. This structure allows real estate brokers to participate in the transaction process. This approach benefits the TIC sponsors, investors and the brokers themselves.

Whether they treat the transaction as real estate or security, we believe the majority of TIC sponsors are highly competent and professional companies. Our issue is with the structure the government has set down, not with the TIC sponsors themselves...

Friday, December 08, 2006

Investors in court to recover cash | THE BELLINGHAM HERALD

Investors in court to recover cash
Lack of safeguards cited in tax-deferral strategy

JOHN STARK
THE BELLINGHAM HERALD

Investors have gone to court hoping to recover hundreds of thousands of dollars from a local man whose firm provided intermediary services aimed at deferring taxes in real estate deals.

In a Whatcom County Superior Court lawsuit and in a bankruptcy filing in U.S. Bankruptcy Court, two investors contend that Carl N. Zaremba and his firm, 1031 Inc., have failed to relinquish thousands of dollars of their money that he was holding as part of a financial service he provided to them for tax purposes. The court records also contain copies of letters that the investors got from Zaremba, in which he expresses regrets but provides no clue about what happened to investors’ money. In the letter, Zaremba promises to pay back an unspecified portion eventually with proceeds from the sale of his home.

“I deeply regret what has happened and there is no one to blame but myself,” Zaremba’s letter said.

His home on Northridge Way is now listed for sale at $395,000. Zaremba purchased it in January 2005, according to Whatcom County Assessor’s records.

Steven Hathaway, Zaremba’s attorney, did not return phone calls or an e-mail seeking comment on the case. Zaremba’s Bellinghambased company is no longer in business, and

there was no answer at his home phone.

At the center of the litigation is a complex real estate transaction system often used for investment properties, based on a longstanding provision in U.S. income tax law: Section 1031.

Section 1031 allows real estate investors to defer the capital gains taxes they would otherwise pay when they sell their investment properties at a profit.

To take advantage of Section 1031, an investor must reinvest the proceeds from the property sale in a different property within six months. Many real estate investors pay for the services of someone known as a “qualified intermediary,” who takes control of the proceeds from the first property until those proceeds are reinvested in a new one, to make sure they are not found to have realized a capital gain that would be taxed.

Some attorneys and certified public accountants specialize in providing 1031 exchange services, holding real estate sales proceeds for their customers in exchange for a fee, and paying out those proceeds when the customer is ready to buy a new investment property.

Zaremba is not an attorney or CPA, but there is no law requiring those qualifications for serving as an intermediary in 1031 exchanges.

In a sworn statement filed as part of his effort to force 1031 Inc. into bankruptcy and freeze any assets, Renton investor Scott Ronk said he paid Zaremba a $750 fee in September 2006 for intermediary services. In return, Zaremba was to hold about $240,000 in proceeds from the sale of a Blaine fourplex that Ronk had owned.

Ronk had planned to reinvest the proceeds in a different property, using Zaremba’s services to defer taxes on his gains.

But on Nov. 1, he got Zaremba’s letter, which stated that “the company does not have sufficient funds on deposit” to enable Ronk to complete his next real estate transaction.

In her lawsuit against Zaremba in Whatcom County Superior Court, Whatcom County resident Glenda Underwood said she had entrusted Zaremba with the $119,000 proceeds of the sale of property on Mission Road, but Zaremba had been unable to come up with $36,000 of the money.

She got the same letter that Zaremba had sent to Ronk.

Both Underwood and Ronk told the court that their subsequent efforts to contact Zaremba had not been successful.

Donald Hacker, Ronk’s attorney, said the episode points out some potential risks with 1031 transfers and qualified intermediaries.

“I don’t think there’s any necessary qualifications,” Hacker said. “I think you or I could do it. It seems to be unregulated.”

Dennis Helmick, past president of a trade association for 1031 qualified intermediaries, acknowledged that was true.

Helmick said investors should require proof that the intermediary they rely on is bonded and insured.

Despite the lack of regulation, Helmick said problems have been rare in the industry. He said he could recall only one Washington state case similar to 1031 Inc., and that was more than 10 years ago.

Bellingham Police Lt. Flo Simon said a Bellingham detective is investigating what she termed “an active case” involving three individuals with complaints against Zaremba.

“We hope to have this resolved pretty quickly,” Simon said.

Sunday, November 05, 2006

Ask an expert - 1031 rule applies in certain cases | Orlando Sentinel

YOUR POCKETBOOK
Ask an expert
1031 rule applies in certain cases

Posted November 5, 2006

Q: I own a lot, which I plan to sell in 2007. I wish to avoid paying capital gains, so I'm planning to buy a villa or condo, in a 1031 Like-Kind Exchange.

I plan to occupy the villa/condo two to three months of the year and rent it out the rest of the year. It will not be my primary residence.

With this scenario, could I qualify for a 1031 exchange?

G.L., The Villages

A: Taxpayers must have held the property for use in a trade or business or for investment. Personal residences do not qualify for a section 1031 exchange.

Vacation homes may qualify as investment property if the taxpayer's personal use is limited or the home is rented.

The Internal Revenue Service states that a dwelling is considered a personal home if, during the tax year, you use it for personal purposes for more than the greater of: 14 days or 10 percent of the total days it is rented to others at a fair rental price...

Friday, October 13, 2006

Popularity of 1031 Exchanges Surges With Market Decline | WSJ

Popularity of 1031 Exchanges Surges With Market Decline

By Tara Siegel Bernard
From The Wall Street Journal Online

Investors who want to cash in their chips on real estate bought as an investment -- but defer the tax bill, in some cases forever -- can do so by trading into another piece of property.

This strategy isn't new, but it's enjoying a resurgence in popularity now because many investors believe that real-estate values have peaked in some markets. They want to lock in their gains and shift into other holdings without a big payment to Uncle Sam.

The stratagem is called a 1031 exchange, but it doesn't actually require you to swap property with another real-estate investor. You sell one property and buy another, carefully abiding by certain restrictions and time limits.

A section of the tax code known as 1031 allows investors to make a "like kind" exchange of investment properties and thereby defer, and in some cases avoid, capital-gains taxes. (The maximum federal long-term capital-gains rate is currently 15%, while some states impose an additional tax.)

You can swap just about any kind of investment property for another -- such as an apartment house for land, or a house for a store. Investors can keep exchanging into new properties of equal or greater value, while deferring the tax hit. If you hold property until death, the capital gain is erased altogether because your heirs inherit the property at its market value, making this a popular estate-planning technique as well.

'Best-Kept Tax Secret'

"It's the best-kept tax secret," says Stephen A. Wayner, first vice president at Bayview Financial Exchange Services LLC, a unit of Bayview Financial, a Miami real-estate investment, development and mortgage-finance company. "There are so many people that should be doing it. They just don't know about it."

The tax savings can be substantial...